<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Mother of All Bubbles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thisischinablog.com/2009/08/10/the-mother-of-all-bubbles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thisischinablog.com/2009/08/10/the-mother-of-all-bubbles/</link>
	<description>The trends reshaping China society, economics and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: outcast</title>
		<link>http://thisischinablog.com/2009/08/10/the-mother-of-all-bubbles/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisischinablog.com/?p=788#comment-489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll also add that there is a headline in the financial times stating the government is ordering banks to put the breaks on lending, so it appears mr. xie&#039;s assessment about the government&#039;s action is correct, hopefully he is also right about it limiting the size of the bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll also add that there is a headline in the financial times stating the government is ordering banks to put the breaks on lending, so it appears mr. xie&#8217;s assessment about the government&#8217;s action is correct, hopefully he is also right about it limiting the size of the bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outcast</title>
		<link>http://thisischinablog.com/2009/08/10/the-mother-of-all-bubbles/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thisischinablog.com/?p=788#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Granted I&#039;m not an economist, but while the short term (5 years out or so), long term still looks good. Why? Because there is a transformation towards more domestically driven growth, though this will take some time to be put into place. What is encouraging is to see so many new tech parks and R&amp;D centers being setup, the jobs generated by filling up these areas are betting paying, and will be a huge help in this. 

The demographics crunch, in my opinion, for the nation is not really _that_ bad because it will allieviate China&#039;s constant employment problems, as well as other problems related to over population. Personally I look forward to the day the one child policy is no longer needed. However, a declining population does not necessisarily equate to a countries decline, South Korea has an aging population, but it still has energy left in it. Japan&#039;s decline is mostly because of economic, social, and political stagnation, their failure to let go of the confucian &quot;we&#039;ve been doing something a certain way for a long time so we&#039;re going to keep doing it, reality be damned&quot; way of thinking has cost them dearly.

As for when the urbanization will be complete, it will still take a long time. Even in 25 years the urbanization will only be ~70%. For comparison the United States in 1985 had an urbanization rate of ~75% (http://ww2.unhabitat.org/habrdd/conditions/northamerica/us2.gif), so the urban workforce will keep growing for many decades yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted I&#8217;m not an economist, but while the short term (5 years out or so), long term still looks good. Why? Because there is a transformation towards more domestically driven growth, though this will take some time to be put into place. What is encouraging is to see so many new tech parks and R&amp;D centers being setup, the jobs generated by filling up these areas are betting paying, and will be a huge help in this. </p>
<p>The demographics crunch, in my opinion, for the nation is not really _that_ bad because it will allieviate China&#8217;s constant employment problems, as well as other problems related to over population. Personally I look forward to the day the one child policy is no longer needed. However, a declining population does not necessisarily equate to a countries decline, South Korea has an aging population, but it still has energy left in it. Japan&#8217;s decline is mostly because of economic, social, and political stagnation, their failure to let go of the confucian &#8220;we&#8217;ve been doing something a certain way for a long time so we&#8217;re going to keep doing it, reality be damned&#8221; way of thinking has cost them dearly.</p>
<p>As for when the urbanization will be complete, it will still take a long time. Even in 25 years the urbanization will only be ~70%. For comparison the United States in 1985 had an urbanization rate of ~75% (<a href="http://ww2.unhabitat.org/habrdd/conditions/northamerica/us2.gif" rel="nofollow">http://ww2.unhabitat.org/habrdd/conditions/northamerica/us2.gif</a>), so the urban workforce will keep growing for many decades yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

